Cotabish v. Cleveland Electrical Illuminating Co.

OPINION OP COURT.

The following is taken, verbatim, from the opinion.

LEVINE, J.

It is pointed out, in plaintiff’s brief and argument, that the defendant in .error company took the longest route for the making of the improvement instead of a shorter route, which would have fully accomplished its purpose and would have proven less expensive to the company. In other words, reversal is sought in this case on the ground that the judgment of the Insolvency Court is manifestly'against the weight of the evidence.

There is no marked difference of opinion between counsel as to the law applicable to this…