Legal Opinion

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hall

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From tbe circuit court of, second district, Perry county. Hon. John E. Enochs, Judge. Hall, appellee, was plaintiff, and tbe telegraph company, appellant, was defendant in tbe court below. Tbe suit was' for tbe recovery of tbe statutory penalty, and, in addition, for actual damages suffered.

Read the full summary

From tbe circuit court of, second district, Perry county. Hon. John E. Enochs, Judge. Hall, appellee, was plaintiff, and tbe telegraph company, appellant, was defendant in tbe court below. Tbe suit was' for tbe recovery of tbe statutory penalty, and, in addition, for actual damages suffered. Tbe statute, code 1892, giving tbe penalty is in these words: “4326. Messages Delivered; Penalty por Neglect. — A telegraph or telephone company shall deliver all messages addressed to a person residing or having a place of business in any city, town or village where it may have an office, or within one…

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, C. J.

The case is controlled by Marshall v. Telegraph Co., 27 So. Rep., 614, ante, 154. Actiial damages only should have been allowed.

Reversed and remanded.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hilley v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. RossMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. MeekMississippi Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API