Legal Opinion

Ballard v. Durant

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 9, 2020No. 6:20-cv-00036Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DEMPSEY KEACH BALLARD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) NO. CIV-20-0036-JH ) THE CITY OF DURANT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Plaintiff has moved to remand this case on the basis that the consent to removal of defendants Rundel and Hitchcock was not reflected either by those defendants joining in the notice of removal or by a separately filed consent, contrary to the “unanimity” requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(2)(A). Defendants contend Rundel and Hitchcock did in fact consent to the removal, that the failure to include any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pfeiffer v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Bruning v. City of GuthrieDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API