Legal Opinion

Chesebrough v. Tirrill

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 20, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On error to the Supreme .Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lippincott, J.

The action in this case is on contract by Oakes Tirrill, doing business as the Tirrill Gas Machine Company, plaintiff below, against the defendant below, Nicholas H. Chesebrough. . The declaration contains only the common counts, with a bill of particulars for the price and value of a gas machine, the appliances attached and for materials and labor in placing the same in the “Hotel Beechwood,” at Summit, New Jersey. The defendant below was the owner of the hotel, and he had leased it to one Ira Doying, who was in the occupancy of it as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Larson v. WymanNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Grant v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Hazeltine v. WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API