Legal Opinion
Gilbert v. SAFEGUARD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 26, 1972No. Civ. A. 70-3423PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Harry and Irene W. Gilbert, citizens of New York, were holders of bonds of William Penn Finance Company and Associated Acceptance Corporation in the total face amount of $17,000. The bonds were insured against loss in the event of the insolvency of either corporation by Empire Mutual Insurance Company. On September 1, 1960, William Penn and Associated Acceptance merged with Commonwealth Financial Corporation. Several years later Safeguard Mutual Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, replaced Empire as insurer of the obligations which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Community Counselling Service, Incorporated v. Robert Benedict ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Pfotzer v. Aqua System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- McCormack v. JermynSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Philadelphia v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- William G. Barnhart, and George S. Barnhart, Doing Business as W & G Associates, a Partnership v. Dollar Rent a Car Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Gilbert v. Safeguard Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Summit National Life Ins. v. Cargill, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- William G. Barnhart, and George S. Barnhart, Doing Business as W & G Associates, a Partnership v. Dollar Rent a Car Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979