Legal Opinion

Harken Southwest Corp. v. Board of Oil, Gas & Mining

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1996No. 950121PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

Harken Southwest Corporation (“Harken”) operates several oil and gas wells in San Juan County. In March of 1994, Harken applied to the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining (“Division”) for designation of thirteen wells drilled between 1990 and 1992 as “wildcat” wells. Wildcat wells drilled after January 1, 1990, are exempt from severance taxes during the first twelve months of production. Utah Code Ann. § 59-5-102(2)(d). The Division refused to confer wildcat status on six of the wells, and Harken appealed to the Utah Board of Oil, Gas and Mining (“Board”). The Board…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Baptist Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Jones v. California Packing Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. First National Bank of Boston v. County Board of EqualizationUtah Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. WWC Holding Co., Inc. v. Public Service Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Commission's Investigation of PnmgsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Summit Operating, LLC v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Attorney General of the State v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API