Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Potter
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 20, 2005No. 04-2445Unpublished
1Per curiam
Harold Anderson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and the Rehabilitation Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court as Anderson failed to properly exhaust his administrative remedies for these claims. See Anderson v. Potter, No. CA-04-24 (E.D.Va. Sept. 22, 2004); see also, Woodward v. Lehman, 717 F.2d 909, 913-14 (4th Cir.1983). Anderson also appeals the denial of his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- D.P. Muth J.P. Muth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Hazel D. WOODARD and Robert T. Mills, Appellants, v. John E. LEHMAN, Jr., Secretary of the Navy, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Jenkins v. Chemical BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Young v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996