Legal Opinion

Hayner v. Crow

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from FramMin Circuit Court. — Hon. A. J. Seay, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Ewing, C.

The appellant was a member of the firm of Crow, Kendrick & Co., and respondents sped him in the circuit court of Franklin county on a lost note alleged to have been made by Crow, Kendrick & Co. to respondents, on which $24 had been paid. Appellant answered denying that the firm of Crow, Kendrick & Co. executed any such note or made any payment on it.

Respondents offered the deposition of one A. K. Root, one of the firm of Hayner & Co., who testified in substance that respondents sent Crow, Kendrick & Co. a reaper for sale, who, after some time,, reported that they had sold it to J. F.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peacock v. NelsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  2. Roach v. ColbernSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  3. Turner v. GibbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Midland National Bank v. SchoenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Tripp v. JordanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co. v. MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API