Legal Opinion

Lovelace v. McMillan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1956No. 3 Div. 738PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a final decree in equity reforming a deed executed by appellees to appellant on the ground of mutual mistake. The deed was one of bargain and sale, and the reformation decreed was to reserve in the grantors (appellees) “the oil, gas and minerals therein, thereunder or thereon, with the right to develop same.”

The sole question presented is whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the finding below granting the reformation. We hold that it was, guided by the well known and oft repeated rule of review that a strong presumption is indulged in favor of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clipper v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Ballentine v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Aiken v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Tsimpides v. TsimpidesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Morrison v. State Ex Rel. DormonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Peoples Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Deese v. OdomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Semmes Nurseries, Inc. v. McDadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. First National Bank of Birmingham v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  5. State v. City Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API