Legal Opinion

Salata v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 9, 1923No. 3714PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

In the progress of the trial in the District Court of the plaintiff in error, John Salata, upon an indictment charging him with the unlawful possession of distilled liquor fit for beverage purposes, and intended for use in violation of title 2 of the National Pro*126hibition Act (41 Stat. 307), C. F. Beilstein, a federal prohibition agent, located at Youngstown, Ohio1, was called as. a witness on behalf of the government, and testified in reference to procuring a search warrant, authorizing search of Salata’s place of business and residence, as follows:

“The warrant was prepared and issued to me…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. United States v. O'DowdDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1921

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. United States v. Martinez-ZayasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. State v. KnudsenWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Denton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API