Legal Opinion · Dissent

Skinner v. American State Bank

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1971No. Civ. 8711Published

1DissentTeigen, Judge

I dissent.

I would agree with the result in the majority opinion were it not for the fact that the land was transferred by the mortgagors to the plaintiff Gajewski subsequent to the time the mortgage and the assignment of future rents were given to American State Bank by the former owners, Mr. and Mrs. Skinner. It is established, as stated in the majority opinion, that no foreclosure of the mortgage has been commenced. The assignment of future rents is made operative only in case of default in the covenants, terms and conditions of the note and mortgage. There apparently was no default of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Conley v. FineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  3. Harris v. LessterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Washoe County Bank v. CampbellNevada Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Phelps v. KrollSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API