Legal Opinion

State v. Reeves

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 5, 2008No. 59528-8-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLau, J.

¶1 Jon Reeves was convicted of two counts of possessing a photograph depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct pursuant to RCW 9.68A.070. The photographs were part of seven separate collages that were kept in a notebook. Relying on Division Two’s decision in State v. Sutherby, 138 Wn. App. 609, 158 P.3d 91 (2007), review granted, 162 Wn.2d 1018, 178 P.3d 1034 (2008), Reeves argues that his conviction violated double jeopardy because the photographs were contained in a single notebook and thus constituted a single unit of prosecution. We decline to adopt Sutherby's conclusion that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API