Hastings v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Judge.
Daniel Hastings (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referee’s1 decision to deny Claimant’s Reinstatement Petition. We reverse.
Claimant was employed by Mastech Construction (Employer) as a scaffold builder when, on November 20, 1990, he sustained a work-related injury to his middle and lower back. Claimant received workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable.
Claimant was treated by Richard F. Giza, a chiropractor, who, on March 8, 1991, released Claimant to return to his full duties, but…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Berks County Home v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- Noverati v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Warminster Fiberglass v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Jorge)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Johnson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997