Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 1, 2011No. 4D10-2149, 4D10-5362, 4D10-5363 and 4D10-5364Published

1Per curiam

We sua sponte consolidate appellant’s three rule 3.850 summary appeals, case nos. 4D10-5362, 4D10-5363, and 4D10-5364, with his related rule 3.800 appeal, case no. 4D10-2149, and affirm the summary denial of all four motions.

With respect to the first appeal, appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion actually challenged his conviction in lower tribunal case no. 2005CF015334AXX for violating section 322.34(5), Florida Statutes (2005) (driving while license has been revoked pursuant to section 322.264 (habitual offender)), not the legality of his sentence; thus, the ground was not cognizable in a rule…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. FLA. DHSMV v. CritchfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Gillman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API