Legal Opinion

Parrino v. Landon

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1956No. 33803PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maxwell

Leave to appeal has been granted for the purpose of reviewing a default judgment for substantial sums for plaintiffs, Joseph and Marjorie Parrino, rendered in the circuit court of Du Page County and affirmed in the Second District Appellate Court. Suit was originally brought against the appellant, Elmer R. Pike, and Margaret Landon for injuries and damages suffered in an automobile collision. Plaintiffs alleged, inter alia, that defendant Landon drove the automobile of defendant Pike with the latter’s knowledge and consent and that Landon was negligent in various respects.

Landon was never…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lasko v. MeierIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Metropolitan Trust Co. v. Bowman Dairy Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Wagner v. KeplerIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. ThenIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. EllettIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Swager v. CouriIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. $1,124,905 U.S. CurrencyIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. McInturff v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. De Kalb Bank v. PurdyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Haskell v. SiegmundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API