Legal Opinion

People v. Orane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant forfeited his claim that the court *950abused its discretion in denying his motion to disqualify the District Attorney’s office when he entered a guilty plea to the indictment (People v Manzo, 99 AD2d 817; see, People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1, 5-6; People v Stephens, 122 AD2d 606, 608, Iv denied 68 NY2d 817). Were we to address defendant’s claim, we would find it lacking in merit (see, Matter of Schumer v Holtzman, 60 NY2d 46; People v Shinkle, 51 NY2d 417; Matter of Relin v Celli, 134 AD2d 960). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schumer v. HoltzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. ShinkleNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. ManzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. People v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Relin v. CelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API