Legal Opinion
EXILUS
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1982No. ID 2914PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2914 MATTER OF EX1LUS In Exclusion Proceedings A-24720564 Decided by Board August J, 1982 . (1) The constitutional requirements of due process in an administrative proeeeding vary according to the relative importance of the governmental and private interests involved; however, it is settled that such requirements are satisfied in an administrative hearing if the proceeding is found to be fair. (2) The immigration judge's refusal to permit the asylum applicant to submit interroga- tories to the State Department in connection with an advisory opinion rendered by that agency…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States of America Ex Rel. Rogelio Nieves Negron v. The State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Peter Gabriel John McMullen v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- SIBRUNBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1983
- Jose Antonio Barraza Rivera v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- El Rescate Legal Services, Inc. v. Executive Office of Immigration ReviewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- SALIMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1982
- EXAMEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.