Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Matthews

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 20, 2018No. 1-17-2141UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reyes

*733 ¶ 1 Defendant Kenneth Matthews, pro se , appeals the entry of an order of possession in favor of plaintiffs Kevin Goodwin (Goodwin) and Ray Rabideau (Rabideau) (collectively plaintiffs) in a forcible entry and detainer action pursuant to the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (Act) ( 735 ILCS 5/9-101, et seq. (West 2016) ). On appeal, defendant maintains that (1) the order of possession is void because plaintiffs failed to satisfy the statutory requirements for service of a five-day notice according to section 9-211 of the Act ( 735 ILCS 5/9-211 (West 2016) ), (2) the circuit court erroneously…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Foutch v. O'BRYANTIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Loyola Academy v. S & S Roof Maintenance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goodwin v. MatthewsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API