Legal Opinion

Gandy v. Seymour Slack Stave Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1910No. 6,574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Prom Whitley Circuit Court; J oseph W. Adair, Judge. Action by the Seymour Slack Stave Company against Oscar Gandy. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

— This action was brought by appellee against appellant to recover the purchase price for certain hoops and staves. The complaint is in three paragraphs. The first two count on written contracts, and the third on a verbal contract. The contract, which is the basis of the first paragraph is as follows:

‘ ‘ This contract and agreement made this 13th day of January by and between the Seymour Slack Stave Company,, of Seymour, Indiana, a corporation of the state of Indiana, parties of the first part, and O. Gandy & Co. of Churubuseo, Indiana, parties of the second part witnesseth: That for and in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pierson v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. ForsythIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Miller & Co. v. Moore, Sims & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  4. Waeber v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Beck v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. KnoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Rayl v. General Motors Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Interstate Motor Freight System v. Gasoline Equipment Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API