Legal Opinion

Hopper v. Arkansas Judicial Discipline & Disability Commission

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 21, 1990No. 90-266PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Paul E. Hopper petitions for certiorari seeking to have this court review the record of the disposition of a complaint he filed with the respondent, Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission. We deny the petition.

Rule 12F of the commission’s rules provides that we may grant certiorari to bring before this court any action or failure to act on the part of the commission.

The petition states facts which were alleged before the commission and contends that the commission erred in finding a lack of probable cause to proceed with formal charges and a formal hearing. The petition also…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Sexton v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Norwood v. DickeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. Doug Norwood v. Betty DickeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API