Legal Opinion

Three Packages of Distilled Spirits

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 20, 1882PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, D. J.

This case was tried before me without a jury, by the consent of the parties, the following facts being admitted:

That tlie three packages of spirits seized had originally been properly stamped, and still remained in the original packages; that after a part had been drawn off and sold by the claimant, under a due license, he diluted what remained by addition of water to the casks, thus reducing the proof of the spirits. Being found in this condition, and showing a lower proof than the stamps upon the casks would indicate, they were seized by the United States officers for…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  2. United States v. One Package of Distilled SpiritsDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1898
  3. Barceló & Cía., S. en C. v. Sancho BonetSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  4. United States v. Bennett Goldberg, United States of America v. Donald Robert Hamilton, United States of America v. Claude J. Hupp and John W. Reilly, United States of America v. Frank S. Leonard, United States of America v. James D. O'connor, United States of America v. Constantine W. Parzyck and Steven F. Parzyck, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Theodore WisniewskiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  5. United States v. Three Packages of Distilled SpiritsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API