Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. King v. Wall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 1930No. 28,268PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Relator has appealed from an order quashing a writ of habeas corpus and remanding him to the custody of the respondent.

By stipulation the parties have submitted the matter to this court upon the record made in the lower court. The relator attacks the sufficiency of the papers accompanying the demand from the governor of Illinois for the return of the relator as a fugitive from the justice of that state.

The federal statute, Title 18, IT SC A, § 662 (E. S. § 5278) requires the executive authority of any state demanding the custody of any person as a fugitive from justice to furnish “a copy of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. CreecySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. State Ex Rel. Rogers v. MurnaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. State ex rel. Nemec v. Sheriff of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. State Ex Rel. Elliott v. WallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gegenfurtner v. GranquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. GranquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API