United States v. Metcalf
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, the defendant argues that the district court erred by imposing an 18-month sentence for his second supervised release violation. This argument lacks merit, and we AFFIRM.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On May 25, 2000, the district court sentenced defendant Tyrann Metcalf to 84 months’ imprisonment, to be followed by three years of supervised release, for distribution of crack cocaine. Defendant was released from custody and began his term of supervised release in August 2005. After he failed to gain steady employment and tested positive for narcotics, the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. VonnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BoldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Leonta EppsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Adam GlowkaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Anthony PorteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. David ShropshireCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Jack GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019