Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Herr v. Ruprecht

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 8, 1960No. 47395Published

1Concurrence

STORCKMAN, Judge.

I fully concur in the opinion of the court. Additionally, I would hold the giving of Instruction No. 1, plaintiff’s verdict-directing instruction, to be reversible error.

The chief complaint made against the instruction is that it requires the jury to find the defendant negligent without hypothesizing a necessary statutory element, that the plaintiff’s car was approaching the intersection so closely as to constitute an immediate hazard.

The instruction is in two paragraphs. The first is an abstract statement of the law based on § 304.021(4). It tells the jury that under the law…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moore v. Ready Mixed Concrete CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. State ex rel. Long v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  3. Wilson v. ToliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. Benjamin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. Stanich v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API