Legal Opinion
Mauting v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 15, 2001No. INS No. A28-965-302PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Submission of this case was deferred to allow the parties to consider settlement. Having been advised that the parties were not able to achieve accord, the Court orders this petition for review resubmitted as of the date of the filing of this order.
MEMORANDUM2
Anthony Apasen Mauting and his brother, Remigio Apasen Mauting (“the Mautings”) seek review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration judge (“IJ”) decision denying them derivative adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(l) (1996).3 Because petitioners have…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8943, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,491 Veronico Blas Almario Kalaw Eleanor Lu Dalisay v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Florencia Garcia Revilla v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Anastacia Miranda-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- J. Jesus Torres-Aguilar v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Khosrow Gharib Rashtabadi v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harriott v. AshcroftDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Guam Contractors Association v. SessionsDistrict Court, D. Guam · 2018