Tarr v. Tarr
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentKnox, J.
Although the majority opinion ■states that “it is undisputed that Mr. Tarr became a resident of this state more than 60 days before filing suit,” I am confident that it was not intended thereby to convey the impression that Tarr came to this state with the intention of residing here permanently, or for an indefinite length of time. An examination of the record discloses not only failure on his part to establish such facts, hut reveals facts and circumstances leading to the contrary conclusion. At and for some time prior to coming to this state, Tarr was engaged in the real estate business in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Squire v. SquireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Carlson v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.