Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Davis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 2, 2014No. CR-10-0224Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJoiner, Judge

I concur in all parts of the main opinion except Part II, which affirms the denial of Davis’s claim that the trial judge engaged in improper ex parte communication with the jury; as. to Part II, I respectfully dissent. •

In Yeomans v. State, [Ms. CR-10-0095, March 29, 2013] — So.3d - (Ala.Crim.App.2013), this Court addressed a juror-misconduct claim that had been denied in a manner similar to the denial of Davis’s improper-communication claim. In Yeo-mans, the petition alleged, among other things, that a particular juror — L.J.—had failed to disclose, when asked if she or anyone in her family…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Singleton v. Alabama Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Jacobs v. WhaleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API