Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided February 1, 2011No. Civil Action 4:10-cv-01380-RBHPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court by way of the parties’ cross-motions for judgment. 1 Plaintiff asserts entitlement to certain benefits pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). The parties entered into a Joint Stipulation agreeing to certain relevant facts. The parties also agreed that the court may dispose of this matter based upon cross-motions for judgment. 2
Procedural Overview
Plaintiffs employer, Mohawk Carpet Corporation (“Mohawk”), established an employee welfare benefit plan to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ellen v. Ellis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Williams v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tortora v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2016