Legal Opinion

Jones v. Robbins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 2008No. COA07-375, COA07-488PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where the precise location of respondents’ properties and the location of a proposed cartway were not an issue before the jury, the trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motions for directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to give a proposed jury instruction pertaining to appellant’s assertion that petitioners intended to develop the property for residential purposes. The trial court erred in setting an appeal bond in this matter.

I. Factual and Procedural History

Petitioners are the owners of a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Turlington v. McLeodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Bass v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Candler v. SluderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Woodard v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Hawley v. CashCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Combs v. City Electric Supply Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Jones v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Jones v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Vigus v. Milton A. Latta & Sons Dairy Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Watson v. BrinkleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API