Legal Opinion

Deangelo Bowman v. Terry VanKeuren, Jr. and Noah Pillsbury

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 20, 2026No. 2:21-cv-12845Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DEANGELO BOWMAN, Plaintiff, Case No. 21-cv-12845 v. Honorable Linda V. Parker TERRY VANKEUREN, JR. and NOAH PILLSBURY, Defendants. _________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS (ECF NO. 108) This matter, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is presently before the Court on Plaintiff Deangelo Bowman’s motion for an award of attorney’s fees and costs. Mr. Bowman filed his motion pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, following a jury…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API