Legal Opinion

The Carnia

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 12, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFEY, District Judge.

The fact that the consent dismissal was “with costs” does not avoid the necessity of determining of what items, in such circumstances, costs consist.

Under R. S. § 824 (28 USCA § 572), it seems settled in this district that, the cause having been dismissed without trial, a docket fee cannot be taxed. The Dwinsk (D. C.) 227 F. 958. Cf. Peerless Light Co. v. Leviton (D. C.) 247 F. 606.

Apart from the somewhat ambiguous phraseology contained in the stipulation when the depositions were taken, where, as here, they were not put in evidence, the rule in this district is that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The PersianaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1907
  2. The DwinskDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915
  3. Peerless Light Co. v. LevitonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The RondoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API