Lehey v. Goldburt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*411The decision to grant or deny provisional relief is ordinarily committed to the sound discretion of the court. However, the function of a provisional remedy is “not to determine the ultimate rights of the parties, but to maintain the status quo until there can be a full hearing on the merits” (Residential Bd. of Mgrs. of Columbia Condominium v Alden, 178 AD2d 121, 122 [1991]). Further, the issuance of a mandatory injunction is appropriate only when such extraordinary relief is essential to maintaining the status quo (id.). “[W]here conflicting affidavits raise sharp issues of fact,”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Welsbach Elec v. Mastec N. AmNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Duane Reade, Inc. v. Cardtronics, LPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Residential Board of Managers of Columbia Condominium v. AldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crabapple Corp. v. ElbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Gibber v. ColtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Max v. ALP, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Motichka v. MP 1291 TrustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016