Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hawkins v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1978No. 56131Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcMurray, Judge

As to the affirmance of the grant of summary judgment in this negligence case where plaintiffs did not base their claims upon strict liability but solely on negligence, I fully concur.

However, I cannot agree to the reasoning of the majority in Division 2 with reference to the law as to pre-trial orders. There has been no trial in this case and the pre-trial order does not in any way control. However, in this instance there has been no pre-trial order but *485merely a reference to the trial court specifically ruling that the complaint lay only in negligence. Both Milton Inn, Inc. v. Spiva, 138 Ga.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goolsby v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Pilkenton v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Milton Inn, Inc. v. SpivaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Brumby v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API