People v. Alamo Rent A Car, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stephen G. Crane, J.
In these special proceedings, petitioners prevailed on their claim that respondents violated General Business Law § 391-g, by refusing to rent motor vehicles to persons under the age of 25. Petitioners now seek the imposition of penalties of $500 for each General Business Law § 391-g violation and costs pursuant to CPLR 8303 (a) (6). For the reasons that follow, petitioners’ applications for penalties are denied. The requests for costs are granted. The essential facts underlying these proceedings were discussed in prior decisions. (See, 162 Misc 2d 636,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Martin v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Baldasano v. Bank of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. Apple Health & Sports Clubs, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Holloway v. Cha Cha Laundry, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. ELRAC, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2002