In Re Dickerson
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Dissent
DAVID GAULTNEY,
Justice, dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. The trial judge signed two post-answer default “final” judgments on the same day in the same case against Dickerson: one was apparently based on a directed verdict, the other on a jury verdict. The judgment based on the jury verdict contains the jury’s findings. That judgment reflects the jury found $87,000 in exemplary damages against Dickerson but no actual damages. Yet the judgment ordered the plaintiffs to recover from Dickerson (and the other defendants) $668,300 in actual damages and $387,000 in exemplary damages. The other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fruehauf Corp. v. CarrilloTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Knox v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Andrews v. KochTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Jackson v. HernandezTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Crown Const. Co., Inc. v. Huddleston, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.