Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Dickerson

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided June 26, 2008No. 09-08-218 CVPublished

1Dissent

DAVID GAULTNEY,

Justice, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. The trial judge signed two post-answer default “final” judgments on the same day in the same case against Dickerson: one was apparently based on a directed verdict, the other on a jury verdict. The judgment based on the jury verdict contains the jury’s findings. That judgment reflects the jury found $87,000 in exemplary damages against Dickerson but no actual damages. Yet the judgment ordered the plaintiffs to recover from Dickerson (and the other defendants) $668,300 in actual damages and $387,000 in exemplary damages. The other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fruehauf Corp. v. CarrilloTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Knox v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Andrews v. KochTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Jackson v. HernandezTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Crown Const. Co., Inc. v. Huddleston, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API