Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Peabody Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1875PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Supersedeas to a judgment of the municipal court oí tbe city of Wheeling, rendered on the 16th day of November, 1874, in a suit therein pending, wherein Robert Bryan was plaintiff, and the Peabody Insurance Company, defendant. The supersedeas was awarded on the petition of the defendant below. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The Hon. Gibson L. Cranmer, judge of said municipal court, presided at the trial below.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Judge:

In the petition for appeal the appellant, the Peabody Insurance Co., which was defendant below, assigned seven grounds of error, but in argument waived the first, second and third and relied upon the fourth, fifth sixth and the seventh, the latter being the usual precautionary general assignment of “other errors apparent on the face of the record.”

The fourth assignment of error, being the first for consideration, raises the question: Did the court err in excluding the evidence offered by the defendant, set out in its jirst bill of exceptions ?

It appears from said bill of…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schwarzbach v. Ohio Valley Protective UnionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Quarrier v. Peabody Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Herrman v. . Adriatic Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Medley v. German Alliance InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Tucker v. Colonial Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API