Legal Opinion

Rager v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided February 3, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00140Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-CV-00140-HBB SHELIA A. RAGER PLAINTIFF v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BACKGROUND Before the Court is Shelia A. Rager’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for attorney fees, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”),

28 U.S.C. § 2412

(DN 23). The Commissioner of Social Security, Andrew Saul, (“Commissioner”) has filed a response (DN 28), to which Plaintiff has replied (DN 29). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and FED. R. CIV. P. 73, the parties…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Elgin v. Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API