Legal Opinion

Mattingly's v. Brents

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 16, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal fro mMarion Circuit Court on Motion to Correct ■ Taxation of Cost and Execution for Cost.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Settle

Overruling Motion.

The judgment in this ease was affirmed October 29, 1913, the opinion being reported in 155 Ky., 5701 The case is now before us on appellants’ motion to correct the taxation of cost made by the clerk of this court, and also the execution issued thereon; it being complained by appellants that the following items included in the judgment for cost and execution for same, were improperly allowed the appellee and taxed against them by the clerk of this court, namely: $7.85, fee of the circuit clerk for transcript of the record filed by appellee in this court,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. CoulterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  2. L. & N. R. R. v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Settle v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Doherty v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API