Ball v. Moore

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Cammack—

Reversing in part.

The appellees instituted this action against the appellants to have them remove gates and bars from two passways which run through the lands of the appellant, W. H. Martin. Charles Ball is a tenant on Martin’s farm, and erected the gates and bars under Martin’s direction. The chancellor adjudged that the passways in question were public roads, and that the appellees were entitled to their free and unobstructed use. The appellants were enjoined from placing any gates or bars across the ways. The passways were opened by Mr. Martin more than…