Austin v. Lyft, Inc.

1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 21-cv-09345-MMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S IFP 9 v. REQUEST; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 LYFT, INC., Re: Doc. Nos. 49, 53 Defendant. 11 12 Before the Court are plaintiff George Jarvis Austin’s (“Austin”) (1) “Notice of 13 Appeal (and IFP Notice)” (“IFP Request”), filed January 24, 2022 (see Doc. No. 49), 14 which the Court construes as a request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and 15 (2) “Motion for Reconsideration,” filed January…