State v. . Massey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The ordinance inveighs against the handling of venomous and poisonous reptiles in such manner as to endanger the public health, safety and welfare, and none other.
The police are required to seize reptiles handled in an exposed way and have them examined by the health department. If found to be venomous they are to be destroyed ; otherwise they are to be returned to the one from whom they were taken. Manifestly, then, the ordinance was enacted as a protective measure and its primary purpose is not to interfere with any ritual which the defendants may wish to observe. They are at liberty to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Lawson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Kirk v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
3Cited by15 opinions
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re QuinlanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- McDaniel v. PatySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital v. HestonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Swann v. PackTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.