Legal Opinion

J. H. Blake & Co. v. Hamburg Bremen Fire Insurance

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1886No. 1981PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from. Harris. Tried below before the Hon. James Masterson.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

At-the time the transactions occurred which gave -rise to this litigation, Cotton & Brother *162were agents representing appellee, and also a large number of other companies doing a business of fire insurance. O. L. Cochran at that time was also an agent of still other insurance companies. Being limited by his principals as to the amount of his risks, he was not able to meet in full the demands of his customers. A written agreement was accordingly entered into between Cotton & Brother, as agents of certain companies represented by them, on the one hand, and Cochran, as…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Farmers' Guaranty State Bank of Jacksonville v. Burrus Mill & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Bankers Lloyds v. MontgomeryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Scottish-American Mortgage Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. South Plains Coaches, Inc. v. BehringerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Mitchell v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1892

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API