Legal Opinion

(HC) Khademi v. Roseville Police Dept.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 16, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02797Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:24-cv-2797 CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner, a county inmate, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 19

2254 and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Examination of the in forma 20 pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the 21 application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See…

2Cases cited10 opinions

Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
United States v. John Paul WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
Lackawanna County District Attorney v. CossSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
Headwaters Inc., an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation Forest Conservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.