Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 28, 1982No. 81-2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error in the trial proceedings, the judgments of conviction and sentence for burglary and theft are affirmed. The sentence was enhanced pursuant to Section 775.084(4), Florida Statutes (1979) and is supported only by the oral finding that “this is necessary for the protection of society”, which finding is woefully short of what is required by the statute. Ruiz v. State, 407 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). We reverse the enhanced portion of the sentence and remand for further findings and resentencing in accordance with this opinion.

Affirmed in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ruiz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API