Legal Opinion

In Re Northern

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1912No. Crim. No. 236PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for discharge upon writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner is shown by the return to be held under a commitment specifying that a certain action came on regularly for hearing on an order to show cause in re contempt, and testimony having been heard on the part of both the plaintiff and the defendant, and it appearing to the satisfaction of the court that the defendant Northern had been guilty of contempt by reason of his refusal to obey the order of the court to pay temporary alimony and attorney’s fees, which said order was made on October 16, 1911, and it further appearing to the court that said defendant Northern had ability…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harlan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Ex Parte Le MondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  3. Lapique v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Altapointe Health Systems, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  5. Ex parte LemondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API