Legal Opinion · Dissent

Philadelphia County Grand Jury Investigation Case

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1943No. 105, Misc. Docket 8Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey:

I dissent from the majority opinion as I find in this record no legal justification whatsoever for this court to issue a writ prohibiting the court below from proceeding with the Grand Jury investigation it has ordered. The writ of prohibition is referred to by jurists and textbook writers as an “extraordinary writ”, and as such it is aptly named for it has been issued by courts only on rare and extraordinary occasions to meet extraordinary emergencies. How extraordinary this writ is is evidenced by the fact that during the 222 years existence of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. McNair's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Smith v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1886

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API