Legal Opinion

Bunnell v. . Chapman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 29, 1916, which reversed an order of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint and sustained such demurrer in an action to recover broker’s commissions alleged to have been earned under an employment to obtain for defendant a purchaser for cartridges.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 29, 1916, which reversed an order of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint and sustained such demurrer in an action to recover broker’s commissions alleged to have been earned under an employment to obtain for defendant a purchaser for cartridges. It was alleged that plaintiff procured a purchaser, that he was accepted by the defendant and a formal contract in writing was entered into between the said purchaser and defendant. It was further…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo and Andrews,. JJ. Not sitting: Pound and McLaughlin, JJ.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gelardin v. Flomarcy Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API