Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Alejandrina Torres

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 25, 1985No. 84-1077Published

1ConcurrenceCudahy, Circuit Judge

I am in complete accord with the majority’s conclusion that “[t]here is no right to *887be let alone while assembling bombs in safe houses.” It is hard to imagine facts stronger than those before us to justify means of surveillance necessary to protect the public. No society may be lightly presumed to have denied itself the means necessary to defend itself against this kind of assault.

If there were no Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, Pub.L. 90-351, 82 Stat. 197, 212, codified primarily as chapter 119 of 18 U.S.C., and no Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. People v. TeicherNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Sponick v. Detroit Police DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API