Legal Opinion
Medtronic Corevalve, LLC v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 22, 2014No. 2013-1117PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Medtronic CoreValve, LLC, the assign-ee of U.S. Patent No. 7,892,281 (“'281 patent”), appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting summary judgment to Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Edwards Lifesciences LLC, and Edwards Lifesciences (U.S.) Inc. (collectively, “Edwards”) of invalidity of certain claims of the '281 patent. The judgment rests on the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment that the '281 patent is limited to a priority date of no earlier than April 10, 2003. Medtronic CoreValve, LLC v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dealertrack, Inc. v. HuberCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Santarus, Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. Alpine Electronics of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Zenon Environmental, Inc. v. United States Filter Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LPCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zimmer Surgical, Inc. v. Stryker Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- Droplets, Inc. v. Etrade BankCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Natural Alternatives Int'l, Inc. v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Edge-Works Mfg. Co. v. HSG, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2018
- Word to Info, Inc. v. Google Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.