Croker Fire Prevention Corp. v. Jacobs
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
In this replevin action the plaintiff seeks to recover certain correspondence, agreements, books, records and other documents which are alleged to have been wrongfully taken and are being retained by the defendants.
The Special Term, in granting the motion of the defendants, respondents, to vacate and set aside the requisition of replevin, held that the property sought to be replevied did not constitute chattels within the meaning of the law; that the description of the chattels was insufficient; that there was an “ improvident ” statement as to the cause of detention; and that there was a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barnett v. . SellingNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Flannigan v. GogginsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Schwietering v. RothschildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Van Dyke v. New York State Banking Co.New York Supreme Court · 1896
- Bachmann-Bechtel Brewing Co. v. GehlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sears Roebuck & Co. v. AustinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1969
- Rubinstein v. RubinsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Hipsley v. HipsleyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946
- Sonkin v. SonkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940